The single most significant high crime in the history of Australia is that in 2006 and 2007, judicial and other officers of the Supreme Court of Victoria,  maliciously fabricated and uttered the several supposed “Authenticated Order” documents discussed further below.

They did so for the purpose of concealing judicial corruption in the Supreme Court.

As discussed below, those specific high crimes arose directly from earlier and ongoing court fraud committed by a subsidiary/division of the ANZ Bank, which literally and purposefully used the courts as instruments of fraud.

The Supreme Court’s malicious purpose in those fabrications of those several documents was to conceal the fact, well known to the court, that in 2006 Justice Robert Osborn purposefully fabricated purported “Reasons for Judgment” that were flagrantly and crassly contrived by him to conceal and deny that in 1989 the ANZ Bank subsidiary/division, Esanda, as mortgagee, sold my family’s land in the manifestly fraudulent, unlawful, and wrongful circumstances of the conspiracy described in the Victorian Parliament on the 21st November 1985.  [copy of newspaper report of Parliament] – [copy of Hansard, the official Parliament record]

The purpose of Osborn’s fabricated reasons was NOT to protect Esanda per se but was instead to deny and conceal the fact and to falsify my written allegations, that in 1988 the then junior barrister, Lieutenant Colonel Greg Garde, and the solicitor John Norman Price deceived the then Victorian Administrative Appeals Tribunal and misled it into a belief that the in fact manifestly unlawful and fraudulent water supply agreement referred to in parliament was a lawful and enforceable agreement.

The further purpose of Osborn’s fabrications was to falsify my further allegation that if Price and Garde had NOT deceived the 1988 tribunal, the great probability was that conspiracy would have ended at that time, and my family would not have suffered loss and damage from Esanda’s sale of the land, and the hearing before Osborn would not be occurring.

Summary of the Court and other fraud of and by the ANZ Bank and its subsidiaries and divisions. 

• In 1985 an ANZ Bank subsidiary (MCL) was the mortgagee of land owned by my family. At that time my family was subject of the serious conspiracy that was described in the Victorian Parliament on the 21st November 1985.

   

• The conspirators named in parliament were a timeshare company, the local municipal council, and the water supply authority.

   

  • • The essence of the fraud and conspiracy was that the municipal council and the water authority represented

       

      • That pursuant to a private water supply agreement between the timeshare company and the local water authority, the timeshare company owned, controlled, and operated the entire water reticulation system and water supply within the entire subdivision that my family’s land was part of.

         

      • That my family’s land was NOT serviced by that water supply and reticulation system, and building permits would not be issued in relation to my family’s land unless its land was serviced by that water supply and reticulation system.

         

• The intended, known, and demonstrated effect of that conspiracy was to prevent the sale of my family’s land to anyone other than the timeshare company that wished to acquire it at a fraction of its true value with building permits available.

   

• Because it prevented my family from dealing with its land, that conspiracy caused my family’s default on the mortgage.

   

• The ANZ Bank subsidiary, as mortgagee, was also subject to the conspiracy and, in the circumstances of the conspiracy, could not legitimately exercise its power of mortgagee’s sale to offer the land for sale on the open market.

   

• By late 1987 I had discovered sufficient particulars of the conspiracy by statutory authority to have a Victorian tribunal find and declare that the water supply agreement between the timeshare company and the water supply authority was unlawful.

   

• At that time, I advised MCL and its solicitor, John Norman Price, of my discoveries and my plan to bring the conspiracy to an end by having a tribunal determine and declare that the water supply agreement was unlawful.

   

• At that time, unbeknownst to me, and purposefully secretly from me,  the ANZ Bank subsidiary and its solicitor were in conspiracy with the timeshare company to deceive the tribunal into a belief that the water supply agreement was a lawful and enforceable agreement.